• mudkip@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You do know steam powered locomotives started appearing in the early 19th century, long before than cars?

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Cars are much more advanced tech than bikes. Hell we have partly self driving electric cars now. That’s some sci-fi shit

    • Cruel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trains and bikes are much more inconvenient. Though bikes are good for close proximity.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I find the opposite to be true. Taking a train is so much more convenient. Don’t have to find a place to park, don’t have to do any work to get there. Just sit down and wait

        Bikes are nice because I don’t have to worry about traffic much, and generally parking isn’t an issue

        Cars are really inconvenient. You have a gigantic vehicle that you have to navigate around many other vehicles, then find a parking spot, usually not close to where you’re actually going

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It takes time to come to the realization that a lot of what we do is inefficient because that’s just what people are used to doing. Some towns survive solely due to coal mining, and they see it as an existential threat if it were shut down. Nuclear power also takes very knowledgeable individuals, years of planning, and many resources to get started. Coal is cheap, dirty, and primitive.