The sock drawer thing was real and apparently he would steal the licenses of women he hooked up with as mementos.

What? Are you talking about the literal op image itself and not what it’s referencing?

And again, I’m highlighting the absurdity the a bunch of tanks that had supposedly just got finished squishing hundreds of protesters and were then leaving the square (that suspiciously doesn’t have hundreds of squished bodies in it) then decide to stop for one dude. How does that make any sense?

It’s not just an image, it’s a video depicting a column of tanks leaving a Tiananmen square suspiciously empty of squished bodies. Tanks that, after having supposedly finished squishing hundreds of protestors that aren’t seen, just stop for one single guy who stops them and and even talks to the guys inside the first tank.

Yeah but I’m not super. How’s he supposed to call himself super if he’s weak to the same shit I am.

It’s not enough to just find sources they have to learn how to critically read them.

I’m not saying all religious people do but it’s significant enough to warrant discussions like these and it comes off as incredibly disengenuous to pivot to “well actually spirituality is quite good for people” because that’s not what’s being discussed.

But people don’t just argue that spirituality itself is a useful tool. They straight up say their religion is true. Those are not the same things.

It’s not a red herring. Religious people don’t treat god like some social concept that doesn’t physically exist but still plays a role in how we interact in our society. They claim their god literally exists.