At least for competitive games the better motion clarity of 240+ FPS is clearly noticeable.
But then again its questionable whether generating those frames with DLSS has any kind of competitive advantage.
At least for competitive games the better motion clarity of 240+ FPS is clearly noticeable.
But then again its questionable whether generating those frames with DLSS has any kind of competitive advantage.


Torre del Oro
Yes, additionally utilitarian architecture like this can easily painted in lively colors to make it look nicer. Imo this also would make a big difference with minimal costs
The other 50℅, so about 43k…
For fatal gun injuries you’re right, but about 50% of all non fatal gun injuries are caused unintentionally. There seems to be about 43k unintentional gun injuries per year(source). In comparison in total there are 47k gun deaths per year.
So yeah not negligible in the slightest, especially in a country without healthcare.
As I said it strongly depends on what you do with it. One of my main hobbies is aim training and there the difference is clearly noticeable. And there are many trustworthy voices in the aim training community that back this up. It’s also noteworthy that other factors of the monitor impact motion clarity more than just the refresh rate. For example an OLED panel has way better motion clarity than IPS panels.
But in the end stuff like this obviously won’t give you superpowers. You have to train to actually get gud.