Initially I was surprised that the Guinness is less dense than the monster but then I realized I’ve never drank 4 monsters in a sitting and maybe that’s why.
i reckon the nitro monster helps?
also it’s probably entirely fake.
wow, i just realized we’ve crossed over from “pic or it didn’t happen” to “video with moving camera or it didn’t happen”….
eventually it will be “hologram or it didn’t happen”
If nitro monster means it uses nitrogen instead of CO2 for fizz, Guinness (15 or so years ago anyway) uses nitrogen too. We will need a hologram displaying verifiable totp keys to authenticate though.
yes the guiness drought cans use nitrous oxide, but the monster uses nitro glycerin….
no wait….
well the guiness has alcohol which is less dense than water….
fine, i’ll make one and report back
Initially I was surprised that the Guinness is less dense than the monster but then I realized I’ve never drank 4 monsters in a sitting and maybe that’s why.
i reckon the nitro monster helps?
also it’s probably entirely fake.
wow, i just realized we’ve crossed over from “pic or it didn’t happen” to “video with moving camera or it didn’t happen”….
eventually it will be “hologram or it didn’t happen”
If nitro monster means it uses nitrogen instead of CO2 for fizz, Guinness (15 or so years ago anyway) uses nitrogen too. We will need a hologram displaying verifiable totp keys to authenticate though.
yes the guiness drought cans use nitrous oxide, but the monster uses nitro glycerin….
no wait….
well the guiness has alcohol which is less dense than water….
fine, i’ll make one and report back
$9 disgustingly spent for science
masochism fuels my fire, sire.