Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-28 days agoHow possibly?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square222linkfedilinkarrow-up1794arrow-down1189
arrow-up1605arrow-down1imageHow possibly?lemmy.worldChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-28 days agomessage-square222linkfedilink
minus-squareMyVeryRealName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 hours agoYes? Racial previlege isn’t exclusive to any gender.
minus-squareMyVeryRealName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours agoIt’s in the name. “Racial” previlege.
minus-squareChippys_mittens@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours agoBut why can’t women have it?
Women?
Yes? Racial previlege isn’t exclusive to any gender.
Why not
It’s in the name. “Racial” previlege.
But why can’t women have it?