• nagaram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe the difference is effort versus objective reality.

    You and OP are concerned with whether or not they became a monopoly maliciously when I think the previous commenter is concerned with whether or not they simply are a monopoly.

    In my view they are a monopoly and they have abused that. I’m thinking of their loot boxes and silent support of skin gambling.

    We should be mistrustful of institutions with this much power, regardless of if they’re actively abusing it.

    • Rbnsft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      How are their lootboxes a Monopoly? They suck and should be banned in any game/platform because gambling is Bad… But is Fifa or overwatch a Monopoly because they have lootboxes? The silent Support of skin gambling? Didnt they make it harder to trade skins to combat These sites? What could they even rly do to stop the gambling sites? Because as long as you can trade skins the sites will remain.

        • Rbnsft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          ??? This doesnt make sense… How did they abuse their Monopoly stance with lootboxes?!

          • nagaram@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I have a near complete control of a market segment.

            I want to monetize that control further.

            I release slot machine mini games into my most popular games.

            I have contributed to the gambling epidemic that plagues modern society.

            I am not a trust worthy entity.

            I am Steam

            Does that make sense?