• beep@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s describing a phenomenon. The image is there only for illustration purposes.

          • Karl@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Idk man, i would rather not have fake images you can’t tell from real ones in my feed.

            Cause: a) It’s AI. AI is proven to be bad for environment. b) Doesnt matter if its shitpost. I won’t mind it too much if it was like a cartoon or something. But when it is a very realistic fake image and you don’t mention it is AI that’s awful

            • beep@piefed.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              To be clear, I don’t know if it’s AI or not. Neither do I care in this context.

              I am not the original poster.

              About your trust in photos in your feed that they are real, you shouldn’t trust them.

              Everything can be generated using AI. your best bet is to verify it yourself in crucial contexts.

              The top reverse image search tools for me are Google and Yandex. If you can’t verify it yourself than assume the worst.