• Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Presumably the brain network was performing more than the task of simulation. I.E performing processing tasks for the machines. More humans = more brains = more processing headroom (ha, clever) for more machines.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah I just don’t find that explanation credible at all. The brain is a 40 watt guesswork machine, not a high performance processor. I love the matrix, but it was never built on a solid premise.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It is a work of fiction… If a solid premise means it must adhere to every real world realistic standard, you are going to find every single work of fiction lacking.

        • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I understand. Like I said I still love the films but I think things are even better when they are thought out at more levels. The premise here wasn’t just “we don’t have that technology yet” - it was patently not credible under thermodynamics.

    • it_wasnt_arson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would make a very apt metaphor for the machines as a social construct, fragments of billions of people’s subconscious thoughts combining to maintain the system that holds them captive.