• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I agree. It honestly makes me mad that people get in such a huff over using generative models for fiction; they’re just another generation of storytelling tools.

    The issue is blurring fiction and reality.

    This isn’t just a problem with AI. See: influencers, tabloids, and “news” that sell caricatures of reality.

    But AI makes it too, too easy to distribute fakeness in spaces that are supposed to be real. That is very dangerous. And this is what it ended up being used for.

    Nowadays i know much better how to verify information that’s important to me; a dogs picture licking a cat which makes her purr will always emotionally positive for me, because a) it doesn’t matter outside of my satisfaction, just like the well told story.

    …I think I’ve used generative models enough to get desensitized to the “feel good” bit. I guess I felt like you once, but having peeked behind the curtain, the feeling has gone away.

    But if they make you feel good, good. That’s what arts supposed to do.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Like i said in another answer, maybe that loss of confidence in the authenticity of what we see online has a positive effect in the future where people start rejecting what they see on the web as the truth and start believing in what authoritative people say again; i hope they start listening to their doctors, teachers and scientists again instead of grifters and con-men. In that case anonymous social media will find itself dead in the water, with media using verified and authenticated profiles winning out.

      It might cause the combined stupidity - that made things like qanon possible - to fall apart into the small splinter cells of town idiots they were before.