• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It doesn’t even pass the sniff test. And a YouTube video is not evidence. Before this is even entertained, there needs to be multiple replicatable experiments done independently. This is a quack on the internet.

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m guessing you don’t know the speaker. Saying something is BS just because it’s on YouTube is interesting. What if it was a lecture by Terrence Tao on YouTube? Also just for argument sake, there’s lots of ideas taken pretty seriously in physics that aren’t directly testable, honestly border more on philosophy. Even simple things like what exactly is time, does all of spacetime exist at once as Einstein thought and so on.