• Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    It didn’t last. Surely there’s something in the middle that can both lift up the potential floor for standard of living through social safety net and also be sustained long term.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It didn’t last because the will of bureaucracy was placed before the will of the people, it was a long decline of democratic rights of the working class started under Stalin and continued by all following leaders. It was not due to socialism per se, more due to the specifics of CPSU politics. China seems to have figured out a better way to do democratic dictatorship of proletariat and is successfully combining aspects of capitalism and socialism, to both make the country appealing to capitalist investors and also build up a socialist economy to bring the living standards up. It’s not perfect (and is definitely not “the end of history” by any means), but it is doing fine as an interim solution.

      • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        China’s ten-year presidential terms worked well for their people for a long time. That Xi has gone the dictator for life route is IMO a significant threat to their future direction.

        Many countries also seem to be on a fine interim path to building up a combination capitalist/socialist economy and bringing up their median and minimum living standards. China is big and influential, but doesn’t have a lock on that.