• Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    1.This is an illustration, and not a logo.

    1. AI (or more correctly stable diffusion) is useless for logo design since the resulting image is a raster, and logos need to be in vector format since you’ll be stretching them to fit into various applications. This is also the reason behind the minimalist logo craze nowadays - a logo needs to be recognizable in an app icon, and on a jumbo billboard.

    2. AI is a black box which gives wildly inconsistent results, and nobody can tell why it does a certain thing - maybe it picked up something from the training data and now its replicating it everywhere. So anyone’s guess is as good as the other.

    Tl;dr hire an actual designer you cheapskate

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago
      1. Logo is an illustration. Logotype can be all text, but even then it’s usually highly stylised.
      2. One should have a vector of their logo, but it doesn’t really matter unless it’s going to print. Logos shouldn’t be larger than a thumbprint anywhere else.

      Obviously AI will output terrible logos, can’t agree more, but some people are selling stuff from their garage and simply have many other priorities before spending on a logo.
      For those people, having anything is better than nothing.

    • Starski@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      While most of this is true, calling an illustration of their logo not a logo is nitpicking to an absurd degree