• rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      2 days ago

      DDG gets its results from other search engines. Bing is one of them.

      There was also a big thing about DDG allegedly selling user data to Microsoft, which the living brain donors of 4chan probably interpreted as DDG being a different front-end to Bing.

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I have heard about them selling search data to bing. While concerning, I don’t think that’s quite the same thing. I get how 4Chan could blow that out of proportion.

      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        It wasn’t exactly selling, but it also wasn’t alleged. They made an exception for Microsoft’s tracking scripts in their tracking script blocking settings on their phone apps and extensions in exchange for utilizing bing as a backend. Here is the blog post where they walked it back after backlash.

    • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There are really only two usable search engines actually indexing the entire Internet: Google and Bing. Yandex also does but I’ve never seen it recommended for anything other than Russian language content (the company itself seems to be falling down a mineshaft at the moment). Baidu also does some although every Chinese exchange student I talked to about it (admittedly not many) advised only using it when Google is blocked. Every other engine is just wrapping Google or Bing (yes that includes Yahoo and DDG)

      This is the kind of ugly truth of the search engine business. It’s a duopoly at least in part because the indicies are expensive to scrape, build, and run. You need to continuously run a large number of servers loading web pages and often running scripts. You need to be large enough to negotiate with content providers not to block you. Keep in mind paying them may bankrupt you as your margins will be thin. Google has a huge advantage here they own a good chunk of the online advertising industry and can afford to throw money around in a way a search only company wouldn’t be able to (this is why the European and Canadian link tax schemes ironically cement the existing monopolies). You need to continuously run large linear aglebra transforms on the results (PageRank is expensive). You need to store all your indicies on large expensive servers with a lot of memory as hitting disk may take too long. Results need to be fast and you will make next to nothing on each search.

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Can you link any sources on this?

        I think that’s my big hesitance to believe it, there just doesn’t seem evidence (besides other commenter mentioning an anecdotal tank man reference).

        • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          In the wikipedia article:

          DuckDuckGo’s results are a compilation of “over 400” sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google.[69][7][70][71][72] It also uses data from crowdsourced sites such as Wikipedia, to populate knowledge panel boxes to the right of the search results.[71][73] During a Bing API outage in 2024, DuckDuckGo stopped showing results, indicating that Bing provided a substantial portion of DuckDuckGo’s results.[74][75]

    • excess0680@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nobody else has mentioned this but there have been several times that Bing censored something and it propagated to DDG, most notably when Microsoft censored Tank Man (intended for China, probably) but then Tank Man also was censored on DDG.

      Partly because of these incidents, I could never consider DDG reliable.

    • Unleaded8163@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      My understanding is that they outsource the search part to bing’s search back-end. Saying DDG is just Bing is like saying two butchers are the same because they get their meat from the same supplier.

        • Unleaded8163@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It looks like Bing is just a part of the answer: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources

          Most of our search result pages feature one or more Instant Answers. To deliver Instant Answers on specific topics, DuckDuckGo leverages many sources, including specialized sources like Sportradar and crowd-sourced sites like Wikipedia. We also maintain our own crawler (DuckDuckBot) and many indexes to support our results. Of course, we have more traditional links and images in our search results too, which we largely source from Bing. Our focus is synthesizing all these sources to create a superior search experience.

      • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        With all due respect, I don’t know enough about butchering but it sounds far less complicated than what we’re talking about