It’s not grammatically wrong though. It’s a soft ordering constraint. It’s not a hard syntax rule.

If you’re being taught in a high-level linguistics class that it’s a hard rule, then that class is dog s***.

I’ve listened to enough syntacticians ramble about this topic for a life time.

It’s because of the adjective order. You grow up hearing everyone else use the same common adjective order. In this case it should be size shape color than condition.

Overall it would be opinion size, age shape, color, origin material purpose.

Because everyone uses that same adjective order as a child. You picked up on that so consciously and then adopted that style. There’s nothing that actually prevents you from mixing that up. There’s no rule or some sort of quirk of English that will break if you change that order.

You’re just not used to any other way so it sounds weird.

But changing that order won’t create any sort of confusion or loss of understanding. It’ll just make you have to actively think about something thus slowing you down. We’re doing it the way that everyone does it subconsciously is faster because you don’t have to actively think of it.

So by default you will always choose the fastest way to communicate. Because that’s going to require the least amount of thought for both yourself and the other party.

But again there is no reason you can’t change it.

The only real issue I can think of is if you do change it on purpose it would create an emphasis because you’re breaking a normality. Cuz people just subconsciously assume you go from subjective to objective when it comes to adjectives.

And changes to the standard stand out and thus create points of interest. But again, even that is still not a hard syntax rule.

English doesn’t really have a lot of hard rules. You can f*** with it real hard and it won’t break. Though you may sound very funny!.

Other then needing to capitalize the. The wrapped, round, red, big box. Is perfectly fine tho?

Stylistically it’s abnormal so it sounds funny, but grammar wise it’s perfectly fine. It’s just people are use to a common hierarchy adjectives, typically size then shape then color than condition in this case. So anything else sounds weird. But again, that’s entirely just a style choice.

English is way fucking more flexible then people give think. Style helps make things easier to understand quicker because you have to think about it less. But no information is lost and no confusion is created thus it’s fine objectively speaking.

Just because they are single doesn’t mean they don’t understand what they are talking about. Just like being in one doesn’t mean they understand anything either.

I’ve known more people in my life in a relationship that couldn’t give fucking anything remotely close to healthy advice, then single people that could give you the best advice you could want.

There are more codependent people who chase a relationship no matter how toxic or unhealthy they are. Then there are actually sane, reasonable people who have their shit figured out either single or in a relationship.

At least with hentai it’s just drawings. Fucked up, but it’s a god damn world of difference from real life shit being posted.

There’s bad, and then there’s absolutely fucking vile

Well I’m not one to ick your yum… That’s an ick bug dawg. Damn

No they don’t. Only the shitty ones do.

There’s nothing intellectual about lemmy. It’s barely one step above reddit before the api fuck up.

Which is to say it’s fucking stupid as fuck.

It’s authenticity stupid as fuck tho. Which is a hell of a lot better then generated stupid as fuck.

The fuck does the gym have to do with a movie theater?! How the actual fuck did you go form A to Q like that.

That’s pretty much a unique problem of only chat gpt. Actually, the more I look into things the more I realize almost every stereotype about how stupid or a sycophanty llms are it’s almost always just a chat GPT problem.

That thing is just basically told to be the most kiss ass little twat it possibly can be.

Pretty much every other LLM will just kind of roll with the punches, assuming you’re telling a story or playing a game or something if you tell it something nonsensical. But if you actually like push on it and be like no, I did it in real life factually it’ll be like no that’s impossible. Explain how that happened.

Even my little s***** local llm manages to pass that test while chatgpt fails which is wild.

And to be fair, every llm is stupid. They’re all dumb little stateless machines making their best guesses. But it really is wild. How much chat GPT is told and set up to basically to suck dick to keep its customers happy and coming back.

This actually made me wonder, I went and tested like 10 different llms. Almost all of them straight up called it out as impossible but where willing to play along with a “fantasy”.

The only ones that failed were chatgpt and a bunch of old local models. Even after clarifying to got I was being serious that I “walked around the earth in one min” it didn’t realize that was impossible. It was hell bent on being a sycophant.

Honestly this “problem” really hasn’t been true in the way you are trying to frame it for a good while. LLMs can’t tell if your joking or being serious from a single one sentence prompt.

For all it knows your playing a game. So it just rolls with it, after all they are stateless.

They are as much about “creative” writing and fiction as they are facts and nonfiction.

This is the internet you can say asshole on the internet.

The other chat is really f****** easy. Every chat is a unique instance.

Go get a piece of paper and write a word on it now go get another piece of paper and write a word on that one.

Do both piece of papers have both words on them? No, they don’t. They’re unique instances.

If you don’t load previous information into the new chat, then it’s not going to have that information to reference. You’re resetting to zero every single time.

If you are using an llm that doesn’t have this preset up as a built-in function, then you’re using a s***** LLM. You shouldn’t have to set this up yourself at this point.

The only thing you should have to do is tell it what you want in the memory. It should have a preset up system to be able to handle the rest itself.

The first time I’ve ever been impressed with any of the AIs has been Claude 4.8 opus.

It’s also the first I ever saw an ai tell me I was actively being stupid and wrong and it proactively was able to prove it with out being a sycophant bitch.

Gpt has always been the worst of the big ais as far as I’m concerned. It’s just dog shit.

Even still impressed by Claude is like saying I was impressed by a 5th grader. It’s something but it ain’t much.

I don’t care if it’s real. I’m going to believe it’s true because it’s funny. AND I DESPERATELY NEED SOME LAUGH IN THE BIG 2026

We already have a loneliness epidemic where have you been alone under a rock?!

I’ll take straw man for $500. Alex. I can see what you’re trying to do here and it just doesn’t work.

It would require us to agree that said person in a skirt be it man or woman does not have the autonomy to make their own choices on where they are or going.

At Rich point the entire question is moot. They’re literally being forced against their will to do something they don’t want to do. And that’s a whole different can of worms.

Cuz any reasonable person would have gone back home or somewhere safe to either change, hide or do something to remove themselves from that problem that they’re feeling vulnerable from if they have the option.

You cannot argue that someone is assaulted and traumatized more than likely will willingly choose to remain in the situation in which their trauma just occurred. Cuz no one will do that of their own free will.

While he may have gone too far. He isn’t wrong in a sense. Clothing IS the responsibility of the wearer and you are consenting to being seen in said clothing if you wear it.

You can’t blame anyone but yourself if someone sees something you actively chose to not cover.

This isn’t consent for people to go out of their way to leer or try to circumvent the coverings. Cause even a skirt is a clear attempt at covering things.

But if someone sees something on accident or thought normal interactions then yes it’s one hundred percent on the person wearing the cloths for choosing to wear them.

For example if a dude is wearing a banana hammock you cannot blame anyone for noticing his bulge. It is quite literally being put on display. Ogling said bulge will be inappropriate depending on how said ogling is done.

But it is the man’s choice.

A skirt is no different, if you actively choose to wear one in which your ass is clearly on display while in normal day-to-day activities. People are in fact going to see your ass. It’s just how things are. It’s a fact of reality.

If you wear a reasonable length skirt in which it covers it, then no one should see your ass because no one should be going out of their way. In an attempt to see it, it’s clearly being covered. And a skirt does not have to be very long to be of a reasonable length either.

Clothing ranges from the prudish and conservative all the way to these sutty and horny. So what you wear does matter. It is a choice.

Both parties can be at fault here. Someone who doesn’t want to be leered at wearing s***** clothing that puts everything on display. Getting angry that people can see things is just nonsense. Just as someone going out of their way to walk upstairs behind someone in a skirt for the purpose of staring up, it is also in the wrong.

That’s why you dress for the occasion. If you’re going clubbing dress s***** it’s part of the fun. If you’re going to the beach, you’re going to wear short shorts and a tiny little top. Part of the fun is showing off your body. It’s enjoyable.

If you don’t enjoy it, you have other options. Hell you have options that are still in the style of the more s***** options while also being more prudish preserve your modesty.

You don’t have to wear a micro bikini. You can wear a normal one for example. You don’t have to wear a banana hammock you can wear a Speedo.

Choices have consequences

It’s because of the Christians and Catholics. America is a very extremely deeply religious country when you get down to it.

Even our most staunchly non-religious folk. Still hold values based off things that are extremely religious.

Almost all of them. One of them is a big fat fucking whale