Imagine not having an aerodynamic house. 0/10
VibeSurgeon
- 0 Posts
- 2 Comments
Joined 5 days ago
Cake day: January 15th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Imagine not having an aerodynamic house. 0/10
Wind + solar + storage is both enough and beating nuclear at this point, and by the time the next nuclear power plant actually manages to get online, the calculation will be even further in favour of that mix, on account of the absolutely plummeting cost of storage, which is following the same trend as solar used to, with costs reductions >98%. Not to mention the built-in resilience you get from having a more widely distributed instead of having a few nodes producing the lion’s share of your power.
I don’t have any ideological opposition to nuclear. If you manage to build it without massive subsidies and taking care of your waste, feel free to build them. That’s happening in exactly 0 places worldwide though.