More of a technical limitation than an intentional choice, but sure.

i guess were getting into the philisophical question of “is ‘no gender’ a gender?”

gotta account for people who say “no” to “gender?”

That’s not even a full byte! Surely we can spare 6 more bits and support 255 genders.

I don’t think the moon landing was faked, but I’d maybe make sure this one makes it before gloating. This NASA isn’t the same one that landed there last time.

Is this the remake or are you emulating the original? If it’s the latter your problem may be tied to FPS. Try capping it at 30 and see what happens.

Im sorry dude but if your argument is reddit and stackoverflow are the basis for being “better than what the majority of people can manage” then I just have to respectfully disagree.

AI doesn’t produce data suitable for training AI. It’s a huge problem when AI generated slop makes its way into the training set because it generally degrades the quality of the model. Like a photocopy of a photocopy.

So where is all the data its trained on to surpass most people come from? Do you think they’re curating what they feed it based on IQ scores or something? Verifying accuracy, competency, etc? Or are you aware they just turn on the reddit/stackoverflow/github/etc. scrapers and start pumping them full of unfiltered 100% pure grade A internet bullshit?

if the majority of people were incapable of meeting the standard of AI, then AI wouldn’t have enough data to train on to be better than the majority. it’s a lossy database of things that already exist, it cannot create novelty or surpass its training set.

Someone once said the bottom to me nearly verbatim for questioning the Iraq war. My grandmother once asked me if I wanted to go to hell because I laughed at Bush Jr fumbling his words.

We’ve been there for a lot longer than people are willing to admit.