The apostrophe-s construction “it’s” suffices for both the contractive form “it is” as well as the possessive form of “it”. “Its” exists solely to satisfy the craven pedantry of elementary school English teachers. Nothing of value is lost by abandoning this archaic construction.
“Its” is deprecated.
Downvote all you like; pedant tears are full of electrolytes.
The apostrophe-s construction “it’s” suffices for both the contractive form “it is” as well as the possessive form of “it”. “Its” exists solely to satisfy the craven pedantry of elementary school English teachers. Nothing of value is lost by abandoning this archaic construction.
“Its” is deprecated.
Downvote all you like; pedant tears are full of electrolytes.
Looks like your brain is deprecated.
You know, i wasn’t going to, but I could really use some electrolytes. Thanks :)
Is they’re and their deprecated too?
Not under this rationale, no.
If the goal is to simplify, shouldn’t it be “its” in all cases?
The “+s/es” construction typically indicates plurality. “It” is fundamentally singular, so there is no justification for “its”.
“It’s” eliminates more exceptions to various rules for word construction; it achieves greater simplification.
tbh the distinction isn’t necessary in casual writing (although it’s still considered respectful to use it in formal writing)
the only people who think that the distinction isn’t necessary are morons who can’t spell.
Found the English teacher.
if it’s understandable it honestly doesn’t really matter
english spelling is a fuckin mess anyways