• Velypso@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If someone is allergic to nuts or peanuts, they know the difference between nut and peanuts.

    As someone who constantly deals with other peoples allergies, I literally never have to clarify the statement of “nut allergy” because a peanut is factually not a nut. Therefore, they are not allergic to them.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If there is any risk of you giving someone who says they have a nut allergy peanuts, you need to immediately change how you handle that, because you are risking putting someone in hospital, or worse. I’m not saying this to prove a stupid internet point; I’m saying this because I genuinely fear you might endanger someone, and you don’t want that.

      I have a nut allergy, and I only learnt of the botanical definition of a nut from know-it-alls on the internet, long after my initial doctor’s appointment. In that appointment, I was told to go easy on peanuts because, even though I had never had a reaction to them (only a different kind of nut), there was a risk of one developing. That would, presumably, have been the time for the doctor to have told me that peanuts aren’t nuts.

      a peanut is factually not a nut

      I hope this over-the-top reply is enough to convince you.