• toynbee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      My brother has a PhD in pure mathematics. Sometimes I get in trouble (yes, hyperbole) with him because, while I’m pretty decent at arithmetic and I like numbers, he knows so much more about either than I do. For example, I recently said that 57 was a boring number (I tried to connect it to 17, which I like, but was thinking of 19, which is fine) and learned quite a lot from both him and some lemmings.

      Another time I told him that I thought there was debate about whether 2 was prime and I subsequently got quite a lecture on the nature of primality.

      Point I’m trying to make is, give at least some math graduates at least some credit.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Is the amount of credit I should give them less than, equal to, or greater than the amount of credit I should give English majors?

        • toynbee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I suppose it depends on what you value. Language is more of a creative venture while math is more of a technical one. “Credit” is also somewhat of a nebulous term.

          • tempest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t know, once math becomes Greek letters and mathematician names it sort of seems to circle back around.

                  • Quantenteilchen@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    More like the difference between a circle with radius r >> 0 vs a point.

                    It was supposed to be another math pun about a line being 1 dimensional (at least it only requires a single parameter) with a point being 0D and the fact that “deep” conversations could be said to be multi-dimensional.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          majors? you mean bachelors? PhDs get PhD respect. Bachelors get Bachelor respect. It’s not the subclassification of study, it’s the level. if you only have a bachelors, you get less respect than a masters and so on.

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Gotta add context for readers.

        Of all the numbers to call boring you picked the Grothendieck prime.

        2 is unambiguously prime. The best motivation for the definition of primality I know is the fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer greater than 1 can be uniquely decomposed into a product of primes. That’s what primes are, and the uniqueness constraint is why 1 is not prime.