• Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sounds awful, kinda shit and overly controlling. Freedom to express disinterest and dislike is an important function of a healthy discourse.

      • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s a tradeoff, but I kind of like it. For me, it’s made me realize how much I pre-judge comments based on their vote ratios instead of on their content, which is more than I’d realized. I think it’s a mechanic that contributes to the group-thinkiness of a platform. Upvotes do too, but I think downvotes specifically are kind of a contextless “shame button” that don’t contribute as much as a critical comment, but do tend to bias new arrivals to a downvoted comment against it before they’re able to judge for themselves.

      • Jorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We have disabled them which means we can’t downvote and they don’t federate to our servers. They more or less don’t exist. Others servers can downvote and they will federate to other servers that have downvotes enabled.

        • Phoeniqz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          doesn’t that mean that everyone but you knows when you’re being downvoted? Because that doesn’t really make sense to me…

          • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            My understanding is that not federating downvotes means that for blahaj communities, the canonical vote count has no downvotes, and instances can downvote if they like but their downvotes don’t get federated.

            So if someone makes a post on this community and 20 people upvote it, then 10 Lemmy worlders downvote it, Lemmy.world would see a score of 10 but sopuli.xyz would see a score of 20 still.

            • Lena@gregtech.eu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              I don’t think this is true, I see 21 downvoted on this post (my instance doesn’t even have 21 users)

              • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                Yeah I’ve since learned that this is not actually correct. I’m not sure where I got that from.