PhenomenalPancake@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoWho's in the wrong here?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square151linkfedilinkarrow-up1648arrow-down143
arrow-up1605arrow-down1imageWho's in the wrong here?lemmy.worldPhenomenalPancake@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square151linkfedilink
minus-squaremeekah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoThat doesn’t make a lot of sense. The T could only be there when the S is also there. I think what you’re going for would look more like (s/t)he(y) Or maybe (s)(t)he(y)
minus-squareBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoI mean it was a joke but yeah (s/t)he(y) works better
minus-squaremeekah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoI know it was a joke, I wouldn’t have suggested better alternatives otherwise haha
(s(t))he(y)
That doesn’t make a lot of sense. The T could only be there when the S is also there. I think what you’re going for would look more like
(s/t)he(y)
Or maybe
(s)(t)he(y)
I mean it was a joke but yeah (s/t)he(y) works better
I know it was a joke, I wouldn’t have suggested better alternatives otherwise haha