While waiting in line for rollercoasters, my dad used to loudly talk at my mom about how “it’s amazing when you think about how these things are built by the lowest bidder,” etc…
“lowest bidder and manufactured as shittily as possible without violating the contract” doesn’t roll off the tongue quite the same.
So exactly like every commercial product ever?
At least mimitary grade has a contract with defined specs they need to deliver. Commercial doesn’t even have that.
So yeah, military grade may suck, but it is still a lot better than the normal shit they sell to the public.
COUGH F-35 RAPTOR COUGH
Quite the embezzlement.
Omg give me the jet pack!!!
Its only good for one trip at a time and costs a jet to use, but hell yeah!
Green paint will be extra $2000.
I worked on a green missile system. This is very accurate
Really depends on what you want and expect. “Military Grade” or real military surplus? I’ve been happy with my diesel generator and the jerry cans are definitely better then civilian stuff. I managed to get a military surplus 6.2L diesel engine for a engine swap, which has a few advantages over the civilian version. Water proof, steel ammo cans are definitely plastic shoe boxes from walmart.
Not sure about US but UK Surplus clothing is the best. I have tropic trousers and they’re not only super comfortable, they’re the most practical with insane amount of pockets and will survive whatever i do in them… and they cost 1/4 of a store brand jeans.
Tops are also super cheap but you can get away with camo pants, camo long sleeves makes you stand out. But the bug repellant treated tops are awesome in the summer.
Man I want to get military surplus too just to date curiosity but I am afraid of getting yeeted into the Larpers’ group.
The pants are REALLY nice, but I totally understand your vibe as I almost never wear them unless I am hiking alone.
I saw “military grade” phone screen protectors at the charity shop today (made me lol), so this is quite timely!
Well ATAK is a thing, so it better have a mighty hinge or else it’s not fit for combat
One notable exception: temperature ranges for electronics. The electronics may be shit, but they will still work when the soldier is an ice popsicle or a roasted piece of meat.
Military or automotive grade electronics go hard
Affirmative!
or attempts at water proofing… I didn’t say it worked I said attempts were attempted.
How the bots aggregate upvotes that are likely veterans.
Lemmy is public, y’all. Be careful.
What perceived risk are you trying to imply?
I think he is trying to imply that anyone upvoting is feeding data into a profile. Which yeah, I assume all my comments and updoots are. That’s why I updoot everything that isn’t spam.
The cheapest possible product that meets the requirements.
As opposed to the vast majority of consumer products?
Exactly the point. Military grade means nothing in regard to its actual quality. It’s just another inane marketing tactic.
It actually does mean something, most of the contracts for anything you can buy surplus are now public. So you can look up that exact specs the military required and can be ensured you’re getting that.
Consumer specs can often times be buzzwords or misleading.
It means something in regard to military contracts, though it’s still the bare minimum. For consumer products, though? No. There’s no law, as far as I know, against ‘misuse’ of the term. That means companies can freely market their consumer products as military grade, even if it wouldn’t actually meet the specs. Nevermind the fact that it’s misleading. They know people see ‘military grade’ and think that it’s top quality, despite that not actually being the case.
Oh, I thought we were talking about military surplus. Yeah, it doesn’t mean anything in the general consumer world.
This describes most of the Internet. Which, naturally, was a orginally a (D)ARPA project.
that…sounds good?
It depends on how well you specified the requirements. Like not leaving out things you might consider obvious. Eg if you’re specifying a sight that includes a range scale, make sure you include that the ranges should be calibrated such that calibrating it at one range will make it accurate at the others instead of just adding random lines and numbers that look like it shows correct range dropoff, and that the ranges correspond to the ammunition that will be fired instead of just copy/pasting from a .22 range sight.
Think of it like making a wish from a genie (folklore genie, not disney).
It’s more like “meets” requirements
And usually it’s specifically functional requirements. Unless it was spelled out, it was considered and or was designed out / shitty to save cash
I review bids for government frequently. The requirement is to accept the lowest bid that meets all the requirements. The thing is, if the requirements aren’t written well, it can be a very, very bad deal.
For instance we bid out for a janitorial contract where the bid did not include refilling cleaner bottles from the dispenser in the janitorial closet, so we had to accept a bid where that wasn’t included, and they charged us $60 every time they topped off the bottles.
Unfortunately in this case meets requirements just means it ticks a box. The meme is talking about people thinking military grade is top of the line. Like how the cheapest tire you can buy is legal and meets regulations, but it doesn’t mean it’s good.
The same way building contractors advertise their work with “everything built to code”. Yeah, building code is the bare minimum requirement for something to be legally put on the market. Building to code isn’t a brag. It’s saying “we do everything as cheaply as possible. If we cut any more corners, the house would literally be illegal to sell.”
And even then entirely too many new home builders here in the US cut corners and try to wiggle out of code requirements.
I guess cheapest to manufacture, but not necessatily cheapest to buy
As someone who works in defence & surveillance as a systems engineer (so by every measure a civilian), I’m still the one on the right… military grade hardware is a fucking nightmare to integrate into larger systems.
I believe you but can you explain why?
I’m guessing poor documentation exacerbated by security clearance checks.
Are we getting a schematic of proprietary technology on Lemmy? Let me get my notebook.
No, you’re thinking of the War Thunder forums.
Why are they making a 3rd movie? Pixar needs to stop.
It’s not Pixar, it’s Disney.
Pixar got its animation start when John Lasseter got fired from Disney for promoting CG animation over the traditional hand-drawn animation. He moved over to the Lucasfilm CG studio, which was later renamed “Pixar.”
Through Pixar (after Steve Jobs bought it from George Lucas), Lasseter and his team proceeded to not only revolutionize CG animation, but to create incredible unique stories with it. They were seen as a real competitor to Disney for a while. They only started making sequels when they started collaborating with Disney.
Eventually, Disney realized the money to be made from CG animation, so they bought out Pixar. Now it’s a Disney product and their ideas are bankrupt once again. We don’t get original stories anymore, just a bunch of unnecessary sequels and garbage films that were probably written by AI.
