• skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      LibreOffice is as good as Word. Which sadly means there are still no really good document editors out there.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I used LibreOffice Writer for my coursework the past semester, and when I used my spouse’s Windows computer to double check the images were correctly placed before submitting a paper they were on completely different pages. This was when I saved it as a .docx, because the only two options accepted were .docx or pdf. I wound up doing everything as a pdf if I needed images, but I think LibreOffice doesn’t have a save as pdf option? Or if it did I missed it, I just used Google Docs to save it as a pdf.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            PDF is one of those weird “not for editing” formats, like STL. Hence why it’s often in an Export As dialog rather than a Save As.

            It used to be even hackier. You’d have to get some separate PDF authoring software which would present to applications like a printer driver, so to create a PDF version of your document you’d start with the Print command, not Save or Export, then instead of your printer you’d select your PDF authoring software, then when you clicked Print it would create a file on your hard drive instead of hosing data down a parallel or USB cable to one of Satan’s Own Favorite Contraptions.

      • bufalo1973@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        LibreOffice has a native export to PDF. And, if you use (almost) any Linux, you have a PDF printer included.

        • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          Even better, you can create a “Hybrid PDF” which embeds a second copy of the file in ODT format inside the PDF. This makes it re-editable.

          Word supports ODT but it doesn’t support reading these ODT files embedded in PDFs though.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          I am on Linux but haven’t needed to use office software in nearly 20 years, how do you access the pdf printer? Is that different from saving as a pdf through the menu?

          Edit: thanks for the help everyone!

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            You literally ‘print’ to pdf. Instead of a physical page appearing from the demon box, it will give you a prompt of where to ‘print’ your file. Windows has it too, though I always use the pdf export and not the print. But in a pinch it’s good.

      • Microw@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Submitting anything as an editable format like docx or odt is a bad idea. The moment a document is finished and I give it out of my hands, I turn it into an pdf.

  • nsfw936421@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    To be fair PDFs are not meant to be edited (especially not by Word). PDFs are the product not the source. It’s like trying to “edit” the ingredients of a cake after it’s finished. You don’t edit the cake, you edit the recipe and make a new cake.

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I edit PDFs all the time for work. It’s a pain in the ass, but perfectly doable. Trying to prevent people from editing files by making it annoying is not in any way a sane strategy.

      • nsfw936421@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        As said it’s possible to edit PDFs but of cause it’s a pain in the ass because that format doesn’t have a lot of semantics information about the original source. PDF doesn’t understand how to reflow text to the next line.

        It’s a bit like having a Photoshop file with many layers, saving the image as PNG, sending that PNG to someone else, they open it in Photoshop and than complain about why Photoshop is trying to prevent the PNG from being edited.

        You can edit the PNG but it’s a pain in the ass because the original layer information is lost. Same with PDF. Nobody ever tried to prevent anyone from trying to edit PDFs but of it’s more that fixing some minor typo is certainly is a pain in the ass because thats not what this format was designed to do.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Well yeah, because it’s not feasible to deconstruct a baked cake, not because “things that are made shouldn’t be edited”.

      • nsfw936421@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        It’s also not feasible to deconstruct a PDF. It doesn’t have a concept of paragraphs and lines. Almost all semantic relations and information is lost while saving a PDF.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        Last night, I was talking to my brother - who’s a mathematician by trade - and learned the following from him:

        LaTeX is Leslie Lamport’s (hence La) macro package on top of TeX.

        I’ve never used it, but for around fifteen years I’ve been working around people who do … And yet I never knew that.

        • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          I used it a lot for university… and I did not know that.

          I did migrate to pandoc and markdown for a lot of stuff, with custom template files.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    expecting word to edit pdfs is like expecting excel to edit compiled matlab programs

    • red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think from an end-user perspective it’s realistic to expect Word to edit PDFs. It’s just that the PDF format is an unbelievably complex clusterfuck and thus requires an entirely separate and expensive program.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        i mean, it’s equivalent to using a typewriter to edit a printed page. pdf was not designed to be edited.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            because people who don’t know computers can’t learn to use the right file format.

            pdf is a container format for code that is run by printers. it’s not something that can be easily changed. pdf editors are hacks upon hacks upon hacks.

    • anosym@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Also I don’t see the problem with the other two.
      Move image? Works fine if you select the right wrapping.
      Ignore spelling mistake? Right click -> ignore once / ignore all / add to dictionary

  • Pirtatogna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s basically an abysmal text editor combined with the worst page layout software the world has ever seen. Creating documents with it very much resembles masturbating with a blender.

  • Sharlot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    The real miracle isn’t Word’s features, it’s how it’s still the default after decades of collective pain.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    TGFM - Thank God for Markdown

    Seriously, though. 9 times out of 10, markdown has all the formatting I need for the task at hand. On the rare occasion I need something more, I’m glad I have access to Apple Pages, but it comes with its own set of unique challenges.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    People aren’t paying for Word, they’re paying for Excel and getting all the other goodies included.

    Yeah, LibreOffice is fine for home use, maybe even really small businesses that don’t have to trade spread sheets with external customers, but Excel is the killer app.

    Calc’s a fine spread sheet program, but it’s frustrating as hell after using Excel for 30+ years. You can’t trust that it will properly import an Excel sheet and it sure won’t do macros.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      That’s fair. Imagine if people invested that much time into calc. A person can dream…

      • toddestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        The problem is everyone expects Calc to be Excel, including full compatibility with reading and writing of Excel’s file formats. As Excel is a constantly moving target, following that path means you’ll forever be a second-rate Excel that’ll never quite be fully compatible.

        I find Calc to be a fine spreadsheet program myself, though I’m hardly a power user. If you want to use Excel, then just go use Excel.

  • buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Microsoft Word is just fine. I assume most of the hate is for Microsoft because Word works just fine for most people’s use cases.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Carving animals on the wall of the cave is just fine. I assume most of the hate is for caves because carving animals on the wall works just fine for most ungabungas’ use cases.

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’m not sure which is worse, the fact that you thought this was clever and relevant or the fact that other people upvoted it and helped to validate your unbounded idiocy.

    • faerbit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      All the issues mentioned in the OP are longstanding issues with word. It’s not “just fine”. It’s really annoying.

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        PDF is not meant to be edited, it’s meant to be a digital representation of physical paper.

        The other problems are just people who don’t actually learn to use Microsoft Word, you certainly can add more words to spellcheck and you can change how images and text interact, the only thing I can think of that caused issues is at one point they changed the default, too many people never learned how to change the layout and keep expecting the old behavior after the change.

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          These people don’t want to hear it. They’re obsessed with the cult of hating Microsoft. If they said, software should be libre/open source and LibreOffice is superior in that regard, I could take them seriously.